The kingdom, hero absent

after Breath of the Wild

A still lack of verbs
in the landscape: cliffs still
the climate— rain on the grass, mist
off the streaming, lighting in
the draw-distance— still temperate,
monsters unhelpful, but no
new aggro, no
random encounters. The divine
beasts corrupted, but
still: the hot mer-folk still at risk
of fresh water, but in time
absent. The lightning storms
the chill shadow of a sky-box
of birds, a death
mountain. As sealed away as the villain
in the castle, the sword
in the stone in the forest . The end always
now, a one chosen
by you/ the fish king, father of your crush/ principal/
side/shrine quests. You

picture: the hero face down
a river-shallow, the bank light blue
pink flowers, a play
of reciprocal in/output/ a fire blade
an elite moblin still
victorious, words interrupting
the still, no, do it once
more: the open-world such as
it is: The cliff existing
to climb, the people to
save repeatedly, forked lightning to conduct
along forged weapons, sans
warning, the fox in the brush for
resources. Link the fire. The world/you still
exist. But

picture: land still
but alive: you must still
but the grass a river
in full hale, against your feet
absent, an exhale, a wind through non-
– existent grass blades. You
still but in your absence
horses over the ruined, reclaimed hill
mountain goats on the lip of cliff
without danger, fish
in the rivers/creeks sea
birds around the overgrown remains
of a still stable.

Posted in 102: GAME | Tagged

Andrew Bonar Law

1916 – 1922

Andrew Bonar Law: Bonar was a skilled amateur chess player and competed with international chess masters. This poem takes the form of a chessboard and explores Bonar Law’s negotiations with the United States over Britain’s war loans, one of his few achievements during his 211 days in office. A Knights Tour starting in the top right will reveal a dominant reading.

Posted in 102: GAME | Tagged

a little called anything is a little called

(all instances of little vs all instances of big in Gertrude Stein’s Objects)

little ways with really little spices, little
sales, the little things
very little difference between little women and little pops
between little ladies little choosing
little leading to
a little leaning, a little
build in little dressing
between really little women a little
piece of string, a little top now
a little
bobble by a
little groan
little monkey a little flower now
losing
no
little piece
inside a little piece
of white
now a little
less hot
a little calm now
in a little lace
a revision
of a little
thing little chance
after little spats:
a big delay

Posted in 102: GAME | Tagged

Sweat

when did summer? why is this
person? how do tropes arrive
in bed and why is sweat on me? pores expand

to swallow intimacies your skin forgot
or is it my skin, or can you please come
here and think, about ikea and what we could look like

in ridiculous beds, I wonder: who am I? why am I
in this bed? I don’t care because
it’s summer. everything is on fire

if I sweat on you and you sweat on me the water
will keep us safe. this is a mode of leakage
by which I mean linkage, by which I mean:

if we arrange our bodies like this
* I roll you over onto your side*
our bodies make a certain shape

no one knows
what these characters mean
and no one has to because

it is summer
and one meaning leaks into another
which is why

I miss you

my god, this bed
I love it

Posted in 102: GAME | Tagged

Meditation on the Body

Posted in 102: GAME | Tagged ,

Pocket Map

Posted in 102: GAME | Tagged

what’s ur love language

Posted in 102: GAME, ARTWORKS | Tagged

Miss Tasmania 1985

Posted in 102: GAME | Tagged

Sun and Coin

Posted in 102: GAME | Tagged

Outcropping

Posted in 102: GAME | Tagged

A Scourge on the Rising Saviours of the Damned


Moth Loths | Silently Reaping The Harvest Of Those Who Shine Bright As The Stars

Posted in 102: GAME, ARTWORKS | Tagged

Server Close

Posted in 102: GAME | Tagged

Enderman’s Lament

This poem is interactive. As you read through each stratum line, click or tap to make words disappear and create your own landscape.

Posted in 102: GAME | Tagged

Cheatcodes for Hinterland Walkthroughs

Posted in 102: GAME | Tagged

Blue Forever

Posted in 102: GAME | Tagged

uncalled-for program name generator, um deadly

Has this ever happened to you? Have you worked in the settler public
service or some tight-jawed consultancy and
wondered — just what am I going to call this uncalled-for
program no mob have control over? Your solution is here in a
series
of cascading screenshots!

Posted in 102: GAME | Tagged

this poem was supposed to be about sweat

Posted in 102: GAME | Tagged

love far from here

Posted in 102: GAME | Tagged

Soft Corruptor

Posted in 102: GAME | Tagged

In Praise of Trees

I. Moss to Mozart

          The fire tree is now a moss tree. The leaves which had it standing in a pool of fire have dropped and not been cleared. Assimilated into silt, they make mud of the road. The tree stands in its own delta.
          Moss clumps on its torso, way past the main fork.
          Moss covers every side of the tree except the east side, which could be mistaken for the north.
          More traffic arrives from the west. More pedestrians arrive from the east. The traffic brakes for the lights. The pedestrians talk about walking. I search for birds which become unimaginable.
          The lichen is numerous-fingered. If I could have translated piano practice into botany, the lichen is that Mozart phrase my left hand trialled endlessly. The lichen is in A major.

II. First Person Arboreal

          The fire tree picked out in its leaflessness by sodium lighting looks like things other people may not have seen: frozen waterfalls in winter, jets of water frozen by strobe lighting. It is pale and I am tired. I lean against it and close my eyes.
          Before hearing the sounds far away from us, I must forget the sounds I made getting here; the bough I kicked, the creak of my coat, my feet in the mulch of dropped fire. I close my eyes and listen as if I were looking. Sound will not perform like sight. A road to the south roars like a curve. A road to the north roars stop-start. I feel quite sick. Solitary runners clomp and make awkward diversions around us, bigger than needed just for the tree, for my humanness – not my size – makes the tree bigger. We are obstacle.
          How much of what I expect from hearing is touch! The cold wind flips and ripples my hair across my forehead, and it feels like it should be a sound. I fool myself that I am hearing the hedge. It is tinnitus mingling with traffic in a small bay between my left ear and the tree trunk.
          I feel you while I hear me as only you allow.

III. They Go Quiet

          The marriage tree makes a noise. It has a thick body. When I walk up to the marriage tree, the wind drops. It’s as if all the trees I want to visit in stillness equally want to partake of silence. On this site, dreadfully smug engines whoosh and hoop, regulating the temperature of prohibitive buildings, pushing out the traffic to go drown itself. I used to work here.
          Leafy footsteps, light with purpose, one Working Late person at a time, cut through from my left, to my right. My eyes are closed. I am thickly canopied by the marriage tree, even if its leaves are not rustling, even if its roots are pooled in concrete and its body is hedged about so I cannot touch its bark. Skeletal clanks from my left and to my right: bicycles being unlocked.
          I want to pretend I hear leaves. I do not. I want to stretch my arms crosswise, as the footsteps and clanking proceed right and left. I do not. I leave hearing a little sound of my coat about my neck. I leave knowing how, when I walked up to the marriage tree, the leaves rustled.

IV. Egrimony to Embrace

          The avenue of trees revisited in memory is closed off by gated compounds the size of citadels. For more than two hours I walked widening and narrowing circuits of their alleys and by-ways, always checked by a wall or a gate. I see where the long-desired avenue must be, across the black river; though not exactly. I make a rollcall of distinguished men who, at a knock, might be surprised into kindness. Their names and silvery bodies might let me through the stone courts that control the much greater expanse of dark green slopes leading to water. I think with bitterness of famous poets of the recent past and the unasking present: men who could say, “Let me through. My eyes enrich your vista and my words make clear your water.” Instead of trying words, when my body will have forespoken me, I walk around the access points, following through to their locked inevitabilities; walk over bridges, espying climbing places, aware of surveillance technology that renders quest into criminality; I lock eyes with an all-weather old man standing guard in archaic garb, who seems to know that I am up to something, and I decide to spare him the trouble of doing his job. I gave up on the avenue and did no wrong.
          So much noise in my head when the clump of trees arrests me. It is severally woven, hence its ability to hammock a hemisphere of sound, soughing at a height.
          Still the traffic and bitter musings mess about in my head.
          Bicycles ease over the bridge.
I am positioned like someone about to jump, in order to share the clump of trees’ stillness. There is water between us.
If riders notice, and when walkers pass, we are nothing worth stopping for.
I break into nervousness. Not yet present to the clump of trees, I am afraid of not finding them again. Not much distinguishes them. I count lamp posts. I refer the clump of trees to other, more distant treelines; I hope to match up significant shapes, but night is brushing off oversignificance of any detail. I imagine inviting a quiet friend, anxiously, to this place, and not finding it at once. I was eager for trees; and frustrated. I must be careful about exciting another eagerness I cannot satisfy.
Gradually the road traffic becomes a milky ribbon, east and west. Gradually the bridge traffic becomes a flow to which my back is turned. Neither stream of traffic sound borders me in any way that constitutes my borders. Gradually the clump of trees assumes me. There is front sound and back stillness. They do their thing. I lean in.

V. Tree of Approximation

          Listening to a tree with another person, listening with a tree to another person; listening or hearing? Who conducts attention to the rim of the sky? Start there. Start twice, and that is twice again.
          This time the thick canopy of the marriage tree is rustling. My ears welcome and embrace the sound. It slips down much closer in hearing than sight would have allowed it to reach from the curve of leaves above. My eyes have closed, you see. My heart is thudding; my body knows that, not by sound. Small plants were trembling; I remember them, but they do not add in their small sounds. Footfalls one way and a single dry leaf the other way do skater tricks of sound, up and off from the ground, more volume in the air than you would think from looking at them.
          More than you would think. From looking at them. We love. This tree.

VI. Intentionally Wolf-Inclusive

          It is raining when I hurry to seek out the clump of trees. My coat is made of a loud material. As I move through the dark streets – it is not yet nighttime by the clock – rainfall hits the coat, loudly, from enough different directions as to make it seem that the rain is approaching from different heights. I am a percussive mess when I get to the bridge. None of the student body dotted about with and without bicycles, lingering in virus-friendly groups, makes a sound of noticing; none interrupts the sound of their commingled murmuring, when I climb onto the railings, lean over the scummy river, ignore the glisten, and listen for the trees.
          I am listening with the trees.
          Rain hits the water from enough different directions as to make it seem that the water is approachable from different heights. Rain is being shaken off the black weave of coniferous branches. I cannot pretend to hear it. I can only pretend to hear it.
          I think myself into the further reaches of the weave, then move closer to the clump of trees. I do hear droplets. My attention shakes off the clank and gossip of the bridge. Awareness branches all over my coat, and in the drumskin hollow of my ears, very lightly, hitting and rolling away again.
          I am a musical instrument of the trees, and it is raining.

VII. Flashback to Belfast

          There is no way of being shocking that shocks. An artist’s shock is an expected delivery. Ready to be absorbers, the consumers of art; they’re hyper-absorbent. You know what is shocking? Care. Care is shocking. Attention is shocking. Being soft and slow. Radical care is the new revolutionary. Forgive me, for I have sloganized in the café, where my colleagues long ago reconciled kindness and subtlety. (This is happening before the plague.) My present colleague sits flaming quietly with tenderness and the students, like so many New Year lamps, bend and flicker inwards. We are sitting in warmth.
          There followed (in a colder city, water between island and island), during the permitted exercise of lockdown, six instances of stillness with trees. You don’t hear in order to listen. You listen in order to hear. Start with the furthest. Name, note, move on. Move in. You are hearing your own interior, yes, even the mindbuzz randomizer, even the bodyshameful procedures. You are not hearing interiority to the exclusion of anything else. Your interior soundscape becomes audible in relation to everything else. Surround sound is a condition of surround silence.
          I station myself by particular trees, and start.

Posted in 101: NO THEME 10 | Tagged

Introduction to Teena McCarthy’s Bush Mary

BUY YOUR COPY HERE

When Teena McCarthy told me she had constructed this book from poems, lines, phrases and images that she had written on odd-sized pieces of paper and had gathered them until they formed a manuscript, I immediately thought of Emily Dickinson, who also wrote many of her poems on the backs of envelopes and scraps that had been used as shopping lists. The connection is not far-fetched: McCarthy connects startling images to form intense visions that vibrate with arresting music.

The poems in Bush Mary work on multiple levels – woven from history, life experience and metaphor are visionary chords made of words. Images appear gradually, sometimes over several pages, like photographic prints forming in developing chemicals. I want to use the word ‘mystical’ here – harsh and beautiful, these poems ache with reality and seem to bring poetry back to life again. This book reads as if written by a poet working before the last century of modernism; albeit aware of that era, it comes from the pre-dawn of poetry before it became clogged with the ‘anxiety of influence’ and experimental verse. Maybe the poems trace mystic notes.

McCarthy’s visions and dreams – abstract stories – bristle with a technique and meaning that became a triumph. It’s the confidence of a poet who has nailed it, then shaped her season in hell into an instrument that sings. It is poetry created from transformed traumas, and importantly, effortless praise, for both survivors and old ghosts that flash behind the present moment or line from the past. As we read, yesterday, today and tomorrow mix, and a generous spirit is revealed that doesn’t grow bitter even after every rotten deal has been broken and served up to the poet and her people. There’s only the poem, only the new life to be written and lived out, only the song that strikes into your soul, reinventing love and compassion by its flashing words and naked statements.

The brilliant metaphor and terrible fact of the stolen Indigenous children, later as young women, encapsulates the Church sending Bush Marys to the outback stations as slaves or worse. Here is the attitude of the white men:

When are they coming?
Dunno, best be soon.

Feed this

Nothing like them Bush Marys,
long as they don’t bring the son.
3 shillings is a lot for us.
They’re lucky to get 1,
mate! Better do their duty …
cook a stew and bend
over, give me job.
Done. Let’s face it mate,
we doing them a favour!

In the fifth century, Saint Augustine said, ‘A virgin conceives, yet remains a virgin: a virgin is heavy with child; a virgin brings forth her child, yet she is always a virgin.’ McCarthy, almost 2000 years later, replies, ‘We can no longer escape / into the truth of Bush Mary, / we’re non-virgin, / used by carnal. / She is every body. / Bush Mary blood’. Then, like Eurydice, ‘She has no voice.’ McCarthy creates that voice in profoundly visual poems, and answers the colonising First Fleet and its following Christians: ‘She is a single mother / with a bush / She is the fucking Holy Ghost.’

Posted in INTRODUCTIONS | Tagged , ,

Dženana Vucic Reviews Case Notes by David Stavanger

Case Notes by David Stavanger
UWA Publishing, 2020


Experience of mental illness presents a paradox that feels impossible for representation in language: it is at once both too personal and yet too universal for easy translation. Everyone has a measure for how it can be done; from Sylvia Plath to My Chemical Romance to Robin Williams, if we have not experienced mental illness ourselves, we have seen a multitude of others grapple with it and have become (we think) discerning arbiters of the real. For the most part, and particularly in pop culture, there seems to be two somewhat incommensurable ways to render the experience legible: earnestly or through humour. In unskilled hands, both options are rife with pitfalls.

The first is wont to become turgid and bloated, tending to an adolescent melodrama likely to embarrass the reader. Even the most talented poets are not immune from this kind of writing, though the best of them are able to limit themselves to just one or two over-saturated lines. It is almost impossible to be earnest and sad in the twenty-first century. The second is equally fraught: turning to humour allows one to be self-deprecating while being self-protective, to make fun of the world while occluding its crushing weight. Comedians tend to favour this approach, and perhaps only comedians can get away with its dangers: glibness, hyperbole, disconnection.

David Stavanger writes with an acute awareness of this dichotomy. His award-winning 2020 collection Case Notes is informed by it as by a kind of poetic meta-analysis. This is not to say that the collection is calculated or pre-meditated. Rather, Stavanger writes as someone who knows what’s out there, what has been said before and how. Through this awareness, he is able to avoid the dangers of the tragi-comedic dichotomy that afflicts so much writing on mental illness and hold the facts in a new relationality. There are moments of earnest vulnerability, yes, and certainly many snort-into-your-coffee quips, but the tone is straightforward, frank, dry without being brittle, sincere without being dewy, as demonstrated in one of my favourite stanzas, from ‘Male Patterns’:

In the savannah of middle-class suburbs
you seldom see a bald man lose a street fight
with a wheelie bin. Evening sliding away.

His poems are at once sardonic, playful and intimate, a medley of inverted cliches and unexpected subversions which weave through the collection and hold it together, small barbs connecting the absurdities within madness and real life, pulling them taut and into conversation.

He is, perhaps, at his most exposed in ‘Electric Journal’, which was shortlisted for the 2018 Newcastle Poetry Prize. Divided into sections with the headings Day/s and Night/s, these headings begin to slip as ECT treatment ‘progresses’: NiGhTs, Weeks, Weaks, DayZ, nightsss, Daisies and D a y appear, marking a kind of unravelling. The stanzas vary in length from single lines to paragraphs, and meander from theme to theme – flat earth, kisses, Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind, Hemingway, Roman abattoirs – but remain in tight orbit around the reality of Stavanger’s disempowerment:

‘I sit in the waiting room with my name on my wrist / in case I forget what wrists are for. / Your name is not yours once it’s in their mouth.’ And ‘“Are you consenting or should we force you?” I consent to be forced.’ And ‘Since my family prefers me damaged, / I commence psychiatric treatment.’ And ‘I was told it was my only hope. People around me crossed my fingers.’

Here, Stavanger writes a body under the direction of the psych industry moving between states of selfhood defined by external eyes looking ‘on’, and a mind cut loose, set to drifting and constantly bumping against an invasive ‘outside’. Stavanger knows poetry, the field and the practice, and he knows mental illness too, the field (he is, as numerous bios explain, a ‘lapsed psychologist’) and the experience, and he brings this embodied and embedded perspective into critical dialogue not only with medical system, but with the patriarchal–capitalist society upon which it’s founded.

This is not a review in which I tell the reader how accurately Stavanger describes the world or his experiences of mental illness. ‘Authenticity’, ‘relatability’ and even ‘honesty’ don’t quite do justice to explorations of this kind, and certainly not explorations conducted through poetry (both the most and least honest form). But what Stavanger does is create poems that expand out from the self and into the world, or out from the world – facets of, it in any case – and, through subtle direction, back into the self. The ‘self’ in question here is not an empty void to be easily filled with the reader’s subjectivity. It is a self grounded in the material realities of Stavanger’s existence and that which shapes it: mental illness and ‘treatment’, toxic masculinity, fatherhood, grief and contemporary suburban life, among others. But it is a self, too, rendered with such clear-eyed and startling precision, living in a world shaped by irrationalities which we take to be self-evident truths, that readers cannot help but fall into its world and, following Stavanger’s lead, become suspicious of it.

Posted in BOOK REVIEWS | Tagged ,

Gareth Morgan Reviews Gabrielle Everall’s Dona Juanita and the Love of Boys

Dona Juanita and the Love of Boys by Gabrielle Everall
Buon-Cattivi Press, 2020


In the ‘Reflection from the author’ at the beginning of Dona Juanita and the Love of Boys (Buon Cativi Press, 2020), Gabrielle Everall states: ‘The main struggle of the novella is about the protagonist’s love of boys. Some of the poems are written about two guys I had crushes on’, as well as, ‘there is lesbian erotica … as my best sexual experience was with a woman.’ This introduction, frank and fun and almost ditzy, unsettles what might be taken as quite a serious book. Performing ‘honesty’, it downplays the somewhat hysterical introduction written by John Kinsella who, ‘feel[s] this is one of the most important poetic narratives to have appeared in English anywhere, at any time.’ It draws attention to the presence of the author, the banal reality of the author’s body and personal feeling. Put simply, Everall ‘love[s]’ Dona Juanita. So do I.

Its ‘importance’ is not what I am interested in. I am drawn to the energy of the work whose noise drowns out ‘themes’ at times, and at times brings ‘themes’ to the fore by performing, for example, psychic pain in contemporary Australia so dramatically. But it’s the performance of the thing … the performance ‘gets in the way’ and you, the reader or audience, are drunk on it, spinning. We might also note, ‘a postmodern Werthergirl [one of the author’s avatars] rarely cries’ – Dona Juanita as a postmodern epic is more playful and less tearful than some readers might expect it to be, given the often disturbing subject matter. As a book ‘about’ female desire, it is generous and open; it is so much more than its aboutness.

At a reading at the Dancing Dog in Footscray (recorded for 3CR and available as a podcast), Gabrielle Everall hits the phonemes hard. Her opening poem, which appears in Dona Juanita, booms: ‘INDI ROCK GOD’. She has a deep Cruella De Vil voice. Listening to the recording, it makes me laugh involuntarily. Out of fear? It is a terribly desirous poem, seductively performing ‘the catch twenty-two / of suffering that causes jouissance / and a jouissance that causes suffering’. The female speaker watches the man, whom parts of her ‘become’, who she chews up and spits out, for whom she performs both publicly and privately, invoking Rilke, Jesus, St Theresa, self-harm, S&M and ‘pigs in mud’. All for the speaker’s ‘him’ (soon to be re-invoked as ‘Rock Tosser’), but the poem at the end of the day is ‘for’ Everall herself. You sense her pleasure in making it, this damaging joyous object. It’s filthy, hectic work, and when brought to life in performance is even more extreme.

Gabrielle Everall is an indie rock god of a kind; she has that mystique or ‘presence’, and an IDGAF attitude that comes through clearly in certain strange fragments at the end of poems:

eyes like bloody chocolate 
and sometimes like 
pale tetras 
you lean against 
the photocopier

What is that? There’s some nod to the ‘imaging’ of men in the photocopier (an important theme, you might say), but the poem is way shiftier than any clever hook it might have (‘tetras’? Little fish). Everall pushes her poems very hard as she thinks through the love of these boys. As well as sick endings (the most rattling: ‘It’s just nothing and rape’), the poems in Dona Juanita have extreme openers, which feel high risk and give a sense of her aesthetic: ‘Bliss me out’; ‘Penetrate me with your flag’; ‘I fantasise ‘bout him’; ‘Ploughed by the discourses’, and so on.

The poems are at their best when they offer strangeness. It’s a careful strangeness, I think, and one which doesn’t care to explain itself. The poems are very crafted. Everall is a poet who exercises power over words; the desire she feels may be the driver of this control over language (when she can’t control the ‘real’ man?). The phrases, often short, come out smooth like bricklaying, so serious and bold that again they make you laugh despite the gravity – ‘that night / when I watch / Go Fish on television / I can’t identify as a lesbian / ’cos the taste of this blade / is still in my mouth’ – like when someone sits on your chest in the right spot. And while the shortness of her sentences and breath betray anxiety or tightness, Everall works within that constraint to produce frightening phrases like ‘I was raped / in a Nick Cave t-shirt’ that land calmly on the page but vibrate, more bricks piling on the chest. I also want to note that Everall really halts at a full stop, and there are a lot of full stops in Dona Juanita. You can hear it best in live performance: where the breath ends, it ends hard, heavily. The last word in an Everall sentence is like a giant piece of blu tack, holding up a glossy Greco-Roman face, ‘debas[ing] him’.

Dona Juanita is also enjoyable as auto-fiction. It offers a better ride than prose – the proliferation of memoir-ish books we ‘love to see’ – by moving so much more licentiously. Instead of reflection, we get a density of feelings presented as discrete sentences, each like ‘passion fruit [cracked open] with her mouth’. It’s as if the feelings are simultaneous and the poet is stuck with sentences as the form for presenting or producing said feelings. But why sentences, which seem to dominate this book among some fragments, when poetry doesn’t demand it? I think it’s the talky quality of Everall, whose performances make the most of the short sentence, not pithy but spitty, angry yeah but more like evil, in a fun, sexy, almost-joking (-is-she-joking?) way. A little bit ‘If I had a gun I’d shoot the man’ (Gig Ryan), but not the man who was sexist. Rather, the man whose ‘eyes were Adonis blue’, who just was. Perfect because he is the crush. Of course, we as readers know that Adymson and Lot, whom Everall’s speakers lust over, are just … some dudes (later, on the other side of crushing, it’s confirmed: ‘Adymson’s a dud’). But the poems, especially early in the piece, are about the ride.

Posted in BOOK REVIEWS | Tagged ,

Submission to Cordite 103: AMBLE


Image of Elena Gomez by Laura Du Vé. Image of Sarah Gory by Sam Lynch.

We are celebrating 25 years of publishing throughout 2021. Milestones include the 100th issue of Cordite Poetry Review, Cordite Books’s 40th print title and the free anthology 40 Poets, soon supplanting 20 Poets.

Please consider making a DGR tax-free donation.

–Kent MacCarter

It seems to me then as if all the moments of our life occupy the same space, as if future events already existed and were only waiting for us to find our way to them …

Austerlitz, W G Sebald

To amble is to move with leisure, with pleasure. To amble is to walk with a sense of locatedness – in space but also in time. As we move through place, we leave traces of ourselves (individually and collectively) just as we are marked. But place is not static either; it exists through permeable layers of time.

How does memory map onto place? Does place have its own memory? How does language amble through and within time and place?

For this issue, we are interested in poetry of location and space in the Sebaldian sense. A mapping of space onto time – or time onto space. A seeking of presence. We are interested in specificity, but we want you to define the bounds of it. We are interested in acts of tracing, of the physical and the metaphysical. We are interested in writing – poetry, prose, digital, concrete, otherwise – that takes amble as its subject, but also as its form or function.


Submission to Cordite 103: AMBLE closes 11.59pm Melbourne time Sunday, 15 August 2021.


Please note:

  1. The guest editor(s) has sovereign selection choice for all poems submitted.
  2. Masthead editors will also contribute to the issue.
  3. We will only read submissions sent during our official submission periods.
  4. Cordite maintains a hybrid submissions policy. This means that the guest editor(s) may invite five (5) Australian and five (5) overseas authors directly to submit to the issue. In addition, the guest-editor(s) will anonymously select an additional 40 works from Australian authors and use their discretion to select further overseas works. For each issue, the guest editor does not know the identities of the online contributors (via Submittable) until after the final selections have been made.
  5. Simultaneous submissions or previously published material will not be considered. This includes works published in print and web journals but does not apply to material first published on personal blogs.
  6. Please place up to three (3) poems in one (1) Word, RTF or PDF document (unless specifically noted otherwise for special issues), with no identifying details in the document itself.
  7. We are not able to offer feedback on individual poems.
  8. Submissions will only be accepted via Submittable …

submit


Posted in GUNCOTTON | Tagged , ,