Lisa Samuels Reviews The Auckland University Press Anthology of New Zealand Literature

1 May 2014

The Auckland University Press Anthology of New Zealand Literature

The Auckland University Press Anthology of New Zealand Literature
Jane Stafford and Mark Williams, Editors
Auckland University Press, 2012

The dust jacket for this anthology was justifiably awarded for the subtle arrest of its front visual. The front features a photo-semblance of four prior anthology dust jackets torn back to reveal the newest cover, simple beige paper with blue and beige print used for the title and editor names. This cover also reveals something about the enterprise inside: this newest entry is a beige discretion suffused by its relations to anthology making of the past. The 1164 pages within bear the desire of this anthology to be another in a sequence of Last Words.

The back cover comment has also been justifiably remarked in several reviews, though with more skeptical eyes. It’s worth printing in full and evaluating the damage its eschatological rhetoric does to anything that is actually put inside:

What is the truth of a place that has only just been worked into language? From Polynesian Mythology to the Yates’ Gardening Guide, Allen Curnow to Alice Tawhai, Samuel Butler to Jenny Bornholdt, writers in this country have struggled for 250 years to work the English language into some sort of truth. The Auckland University Press Anthology of New Zealand Literature is the first single-volume collection of Aotearoa’s major writing, from early exploration and encounter to a globalized, multicultural present. In fiction and non-fiction, letters and speeches, stories and songs, the editors unearth the diverse voices of the New Zealand imagination. And for years to come this anthology will be our guide to what’s worth reading—and why.

Let’s start with the claim to ‘truth’: such a claim orients itself immediately in relation to untruth, to the (thereby implicitly) wrong or lying things that have been presumably excluded or avoided in the present instance. In other words, rhetorically speaking, anything not included here is in the camp of ‘untruth’. Then let’s move to ‘only just been worked,’ put that phrase against ‘250 years,’ and wonder about the claim to literary ‘recency.’ A quarter-millennium year count is considerable; it exceeds, for example, the founding of the United States of America (1776), whose literature no longer has any truck with recency bids. Let’s now pause to note the inclusion of the Māori place name Aotearoa (‘Land of the Long White Cloud’), here wedged into the middle of the back cover blurb rather than, say, included in the title of the book itself.

But then, that placement fits with the idea that this ‘place’ has ‘only just been worked into language.’ Perhaps a better word would have been ‘writing’ rather than ‘language,’ since, of course, language has been operating in Aotearoa New Zealand for at least 700 years (even if one goes by the most conservative estimates of the arrival of the first human beings). In a way, the marginalising of the Māori place name is right, reflecting the general orientation of the book’s contents. Similarly, the genre summary of the blurb’s penultimate sentence excludes drama and poetry, which at least has the virtue of according with what has been mostly excluded from the anthology.

Finally, let’s consider the head count slippage between the final two sentences. First, this anthology’s choices are attributed to ‘the editors’ – two people – and then the blurb opens to a ‘we’ that, presumably, includes everyone in the world, or in Aotearoa New Zealand at least. One could, at a stretch, read that ‘we’ as indicating that the two editors will use this book as their guide for years to come.

The unpacking of this blurb uncovers the fault lines of any anthology. Entries in a book like this are chosen by one or two people – occasionally by a small committee of persons – to achieve some moment in disciplinary assumptions and designs. It then is packaged as a broad guide to knowing. The slip between editorial choice and objectified assertion of generic authority is the problem here. The situation is not unlike the leader of a country making a decision and then having to carry out rhetoric that naturalises that choice, as though it were the only and best choice to have made for that place and time.

Graver problems grace the table of contents. The bundling of entries under thematic headings is always – even necessarily – a sign of an effort to pre-determine the meaning of those entries. To pre-determine the potential significance of imaginative writings is to wrangle them into cultural significance before they are well out of the gate. If we want to know how to understand New Zealand [sic] literature generally, insofar as it is to be summarised by the editorial apparatus of this book, we need do no more than read the sub-headings and ponder their cultural directions. It is worth writing out these thematic headings in full, because they indicate what this book is doing. Page ranges are in brackets following each set of topical and sub-topical categories:

Contact: The Uncultured Shore, Poetic Projections, Missionaries, Whalers and Pakeha Maori [19-38]

Colonial: Treaties and Declarations, Imagined Worlds, The World to Hand, Colonial Romance, War, Preservationism [39-99]

Maoriland: Settler Ecologies, Politics, Work, Colonial Gothic, A Dying Race?, The Kainga and the Modern World, The Historical Imaginary, A New Zealand Literature? [100-205]

Between the Wars: Beautiful Cemeteries, What is it Makes the Stranger?, At the Beach, In the Garden, Retrospection, In Anger, The Anti-Puritans [206-310]

Cultural Nationalisms: Distance Looks Our Way, A Home in Thought, Through Pakeha Eyes, The Anti-Myth, Depression, Masculinities [311-382]

Fretful Sleepers: After the War: Suburbia, Unhomely, New Zealand And Its Discontents, Late Romantics, The Moral Plane of War, Teachers, The Social Pattern [383-486]

From Kiwi Culture to Counter Culture: Vernaculars, The New Zealanders, Provincial Gothic, The Problem of Engineless Flight, The Bomb is Made, Te Ao Hou, Imagining the Other, The Joy of Sex, Blast [487-619]

Earthly: The Seventies: Pipe Dreams, Earthly, Domestics, Transgression, Against the Softness of Woman, Fearful Ecologies, The Maori Renaissance, I, Because He Was a Man: Speaking of War [620-702]

Whaddarya? The Eighties: National Anthems, The Maori Renaissance, II, Submerged Histories, Memory and Desire, Suburban Gothic, Driving Into the Story, Sexual Politics, Being Away, Reading the Landscape [703-827]

Cabin Fever: The Nineties: Floating Nation, The Unpoetic, Postmodern Ecologies, Magical Realisms, Hardcore, Writing Back, Love, Young
Knowledge, [828-940]

How to Live Elsewhere: Living Here, Being the Other, Overseasia, Literary Returns, Domestic, Personal Effects, Longing, Last Words [941-1068]

This entry was posted in BOOK REVIEWS and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

About Lisa Samuels

Lisa Samuels’s recent books are Wild Dialectics (poetry, Shearsman 2012) and Anti M (memoir, Chax 2013), and her experimental novel Tender Girl (Dusie Press) will be out in September 2015. She is based in Tāmaki Makaurau/Auckland, where she teaches writing and theory at the University of Auckland. For the first half of 2016 she’ll live back in the U.S., working on new books, essays, and sound art in Seattle.

Further reading:

Related work:

One Response to Lisa Samuels Reviews The Auckland University Press Anthology of New Zealand Literature

  1. Pingback: Precisely what is the ideal strategy to Compose an efficient Investigation paper? - Beauty Fashion Web