Coincidentally Contiguous

                  or

Non-Einsteinian Relativism


a ‘Bad’ Idea

gets a quick approving

slap on the butt

and takes off fast;
a ‘Good’ Idea

gets its bottom patted

comfortingly (several times)

by the ‘Formal Soothing Hand

of (Fickle?) Approbation’

and glides away.
From either

of these ‘Ideas’,
n o t h i n g

results.
Whereas,
in capitals similar

to those 
m i s s i n g

at the start of

Wittgenstein’s

‘The Big Typescript’
HOW TO

TART UP

APPLES
(headlined

in a lucent, gloss-red box)

on a

magazine cover,

facing lined-up shoppers

at a checkout

counter,

gets picked up,

taken home

to turn into food.
Question is:

will the food

produce, in its consumers

‘good’ ideas?

(and who … would decide who

would be the better judge

… of what  these ‘good’ ideas

might consist of?),
‘Good’ being a concept

that only ‘really knows its place’

when its weak back is butted up against a rock

of something strong that tout le monde

thinks heinous
& is there really such a place?