Extract: Is Canberra a Metonym?

By and | 6 November 2026

Toby Fitch; John Kinsella

Starting with an open-ended, resonant poem title of some kind, and then trading lines, back and forth over email, John Kinsella and Toby Fitch built one poem at a time across several years until the mostly long poems of this manuscript began to accumulate and spiral around the question, Is Canberra a metonym? Here are four of those poems.

Prank

At first prank,
as shipping container
upon shipping container

opened to reveal parts
they relished the thought
of layering vox-pops from

vacuum cleaner maws
all across those air waves.
This piqued lobbyists,

their mithril-vested
interests, and war plans
were let slip in DMs. At

second prank, monologues
from minor characters’
voices in their talky heads

sold them on the prospect
of becoming a prospector
by proxy, of supplying the

shiny parts of the machinery
for a nightmare conducted
by some other ‘global power’

on behalf of another.
It was too irresistible
not to settle into, like

the promise of a wink,
a secret pact, or a dessert
at the ‘Clean Plate Club’.

And the premise was not
so outlandish now the land
was apparently on offer

as future tourism hotspot,
nor now their souls had
been hit by an outage.

However unwieldy
behind the wheel,
they were now on song,

a-okay, even splendid
contents dished up
to the lowest bidder

for a flash-in-the-pan
ballot harvester. Out
of the grain elevator

and down the price rungs,
right into missile silos and
out through the comments

sections, weapons designs
from the home dealer
working with a reasonably

decent 3D printer spread
like, well, wildfire, even
if it turned out to be

the eponymous prank.
At third prank, there’s
a fuel-inefficient Netflix

series to be made from
the Lord it Over Them
bright white goods

manufacturers ready
to join a party plan,
bevelling each other’s

heads so that the sitch
becomes tantamount,
before and after

a cleaving of the rhetoric
incorporating corporate
bodies, the body incorporate

as leverage to inveigle
uranium dreams
into the water supply

and tender each pealing
backyard renovation
null and void within

One Hundred Days
in ways that suit offshore
patriots and absentee

landlords, in ways that
hold sway with donors.
There are no character

limits to the pranksters’
give-aways, but this isn’t
a metonym for Canberra,

is it? Should we dare risk
questioning all this
(What, after all, is

a prank but an issue
of tone, a case of
moderation in all things,

creating the kind of
bothsidesism you can’t
not get behind, yeah?)? Nah,

question time is an open
and shut case, barely a
flight risk. And Parliament’s

about to rise for the year,
and the promises made
will hang themselves

from the Christmas trees,
the silver-lined policies
baubling from branches,

till the next set of pranks
tumble out of the ballot
box and into the dish

of New Year’s resolutions.
One for the plaster,
one for the paid, one

for the little boy’s
investment portfolios
shoring up his reign.

 


This entry was posted in CHAPBOOKS and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

Related work:

Comments are closed.